Economic Presence
  • Home
  • Paradox found
    • Paradox found

I guess I am overdue for a Eurozone post

9/30/2011

0 Comments

 
As the drama unfolding in the Eurozone is moving toward its final act, this chapter of European history, which began as a romance, is now morphing  into a Greek Tragedy.  Unfortunately for the global economy there is no “Deus ex machina”
waiting in the wings to swoop down and save the Euro – it will collapse. The  Eurozone is trying to be a little pregnant, either you completely integrate,  form a fiscal union and become “The United States of Europe” or you have to  disband and let countries have their own monetary policy. The former is unimaginable therefore the latter will happen. In April of last year, I argued  that the contagion would spread to Italy, that investors should purchase credit  default swaps (CDS) on Italian debt and that this would be the destabilizing  event that would eventually trigger the Euro’s collapse. Italian bonds just recently came under pressure.  

In the absence of monetary policy, the only way  that Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal, or Spain (PIIGS) can become competitive
with Germany is through a period of sustained deflation.  This traps them in a vicious cycle. PIIGS cuts its spending and raises
  taxes which lower aggregate demand; this leads to higher budget deficits which  lead to cuts in spending and higher taxes which lead to lower aggregate demand.  Rinse, wash, and repeat.  Though I  identified this problem a year ago, we can now see that this is what is actually  happening in Greece.  By way of comparison,  Argentina tried to maintain a peg with  the US dollar in the late 90s, experienced deflation that caused social upheaval  and eventually went off the peg and defaulted on its debt. 
 
Greece owes over $500 Billion Euros to French and German Banks. In commercial lending, we used to have a saying, “if  you owe the bank one hundred thousand dollars that’s your problem, if you owe the bank a million dollars that’s the bank problem.” The Greek debt is no longer a problem of the Greeks. It is a problem of the French and German banks, which,  just like the US policy response to their financial crisis in 2008, is being passed down to the French and German taxpayer.  After Greece has implemented the much needed reforms that will allow for economic competiveness, stability and long term viability, the Greek bargaining position will start at “we will refloat the drachma and default on all our debt”.  At that point, Germany, and the rest of the Eurozone will be in a very poor bargaining position.

Argentina only paid its bond holders 40 cents on the dollar. The latest  bailout for Greece represents a 21% haircut so there is still much pain in the pipeline.  And for those of you who might be  inclined to think this type of can kicking can go on forever - don’t. To cover all the bad Eurozone debt some are estimating that Germany would have to issue  debt as high as 133% of GDP.

The Eurozone was never built to last, and I warned my students in my International Macroeconomics classes, since 2002, that it would not likely survive due to differences in the various economies and their inabilility to make adjustments through monetary policy.
 
I was not the only one thinking this way.

So did Milton Freidman at a Bank of Canada conference in 2000 :
Milton Friedman:…I think the euro is in its honeymoon phase. I hope it succeeds, but I have very low expectations for it. I think that differences are going to  accumulate among the various countries and that non-synchronous shocks are going  to affect them. Right now, Ireland is a very different state; it needs a very different monetary policy from that of Spain or Italy. On purely theoretical  grounds, it’s hard to believe that it’s going to be a stable system for a long time.


A curiosity of all this is that although the Eurozone was never an optimal currency zone, Robert Mundell, who won a nobel prize in part for this theory, has beeen a cheerleader from the Euro's inception.

More recently Mundell was quoted as saying:
 
"The euro is too strong. A weaker euro is the best news you could have for  governments (in trouble)."


"The ECB should follow an easier policy. Of course they have a strict rule to safeguard against inflation but that is not correct. I have never believed that  central banks should have rigid inflation targeting. That is not a good thing to  stabilize. There is nothing in economic theory to back this."


He added it is folly to tighten monetary policy into a "deflationary" oil  spike, (as the ECB did in 2008 and has just done again). "That is exactly the  wrong thing to do".

While it is true that the ECB could of been following a looser  policy, the value of the Euro is basically based on Germany's productivity  which means that its equilibrium value, short of a massive inflationary policy by the ECB, will be too high for the competitiveness of the PIIGS. Only prolonged  deflation, currently being prevented by the bailouts in the case of Greece, can  bring these countries into international competitiveness.
 

What's more, these countries have to deal with the fact that the low wage manufacturing jobs that went to China and other developing countries and are not coming back. Germany is positioned in the high value added manufacturing sector and it will not be easy for these countries to carve out a competitive  niche without some sort of sustained program of economic development, akin to that which Jeffrey Sachs is advocating for the United Sates. Given these realities, it will simply be easier to dissolve the Eurozone, float your own currency, and impose trade sanctions to establish jobs for the lower skilled workers.
0 Comments

You Have to be Cruel to be Kind- In the Right Measure

9/26/2011

0 Comments

 
I picked up a copy of``` Psychology Today`` last Christmas and I came across an interesting article on road design and safety. It turns out that the flatest, widest  roads are the most dangerous. Engineers are now designing roads with obstacles and making them more narrow in order to make them safer.

I had been thinking a lot, before running into that article, about this very idea wih resepct to central bank behaviour. I believe the US Federal Reserve telegraphs too much in terms of its policy intentions and the market has become somewhat addicted to the Federal Reserve bailing it out in times of trouble. I don´t think it is healthy for the market to perceive a ``Bernake put``. Furthermore, as I mentioned in an earleir post ``We are all hedge fund managers now`` the central bank is creating an incentive to market particpants to play much of the same game in selling short term risk. This is apparent from the levels of the VIX in the aftermath of the global finanacial crisis.

To me optimal central bank policy would have a level of randomnss, where interest rates could go up even in a recession even without inflation being sparked.  This would have the effect of increasing volatility and cause everybody in the economy to delever because VaR models set their limits on the basis of volatility. Taken far enough it would encourage long term contracting and thus further reduce interest rate exposure to the broader economy. Clearly, this is  going to be a problem as we move to higher interest rates because everyone is on the short end  floating - getting to fixed is going to be tricky.

And yet as much as unpredicatable is optimal; it is very difficult to operationailze. Imagine if the Fed would say , ``our randomenss model tells us we need to set short term rates at 3% - right now``. A recent blog post highlights this tension:


Much like John Boyd, Sun Tzu emphasised the role of deception in war: “All warfare is based on deception”. In the context of regulation, “deception” is best understood as the need for the regulator to be unpredictable. This is not uncommon in other war-like economic domains. Google, for example, must maintain the secrecy and ambiguity of its search algorithms in order to stay one step ahead of the SEO firms’ attempts to game them. An unpredictable regulator may seem like a crazy idea but in fact it is a well-researched option in the central banking policy arsenal. In a paper for the Federal Reserve bank of Richmond in 1999, Jeffrey Lacker and Marvin Goodfriend analysed the merits of a regulator adopting a stance of ‘constructive ambiguity’. They concluded that a stance of constructive ambiguity was unworkable and could not prevent the moral hazard that arose from the central bank’s commitment to backstop banks in times of crisis. The reasoning was simple: constructive ambiguity is not time-consistent. As Lacker and Goodfriend note: “The problem with adding variability to central bank lending policy is that the central bank would have trouble sticking to it, for the same reason that central banks tend to overextend lending to begin with. An announced policy of constructive ambiguity does nothing to alter the ex post incentives that cause central banks to lend in the first place. In any particular instance the central bank would want to ignore the spin of the wheel.” Steve Waldman summed up the time-consistency problem in regulation well when he noted: “Given the discretion to do so, financial regulators will always do the wrong thing.” In fact, Lacker has argued that it was this stance of constructive ambiguity combined with the creditor bailouts since Continental Illinois that the market understood to be an implicit commitment to bailout TBTF banks.



0 Comments

The Rise of the Generalist.

9/23/2011

0 Comments

 
The way we think about our problems is of paramount importance as to the way in which we will confront them. On my second post of this blog, Resolved, 08/20/2011, I commented on the need for generalists to become a more promininent feature of society at large. In my post, "We Are All Hedge Fund Managers Now", 09/11/2011, I am admonishing the need for portfolio managers to broaden the perspective from which they approach their craft. It seems to me the world's problems have become too interconnected, and now, more than ever before, an understanding of systems thinking is required to confront these challenges. A recent post on Marginal Revolution shares some of my perspective on these matters.

"I don’t know if I’ve heard anyone say this and I am not quite sure what I think  about it myself, but one way to view the economy in the Information Age is that  the returns to specialization are falling.
0 Comments

More observers join the chourus and predict riots in the US

9/23/2011

0 Comments

 
Slate has weighed in the potential for riots in the US. So has prominent blogger Paul Kedrosky. On is blog, Infectious Greed, he has gone as far as setting a date certain, the wake of the 2012 elections, as to when riots in the US will start to arrive full force. We are going to pass through an era of social upheaveal not seen since the 1960s. What is needed is an economic program that will be inclusive and bring employment for those in the bottom quartile of society. Absent a viable economic development program, once social assistance programs are cut off and unemplyment becomes entrenched people will turn to desperate means to secure their existence.

0 Comments

Cue the Trade Protectionism

9/14/2011

0 Comments

 
And just as if I were writing the screenplay for the movie "US Economy: Interrupted"; Trade Protectionism will be a fundamental part of the new fiscal package. Of course the structural job losses, that make the fiscal package necessary went to China and other DCs but this doesn't stop the US from infliciting pain on its passive aggressive spouse Canada.

This is just the beginning. It is much easier to blame others for your problems than accept responsibility, make hard choices, live with them and change. Trust me, I know.




0 Comments

The Short Run:Fiscal Stimulus versus Redistributionist Reform

9/13/2011

2 Comments

 
As we are watching the US economy decelerate and unemployment remain high, American fiscal policy has emerged front and center in the public debate, including on these pages.

I have come to re-evaluate my justification, but not my desire, for a stronger fiscal policy than the US has been pursing over the course of the past two years.

I have identified over several posts that the US, since China entered the WTO, on Sept. 17, 2001, has shed approximately six
million manufacturing jobs that were mainly held by low skilled workers. The plight of these workers, 10 years ago, is effectively chronicled in the second season of HBO's award winning series "The Wire". These job losses are structural; the economy is never going to replace them under the current competitive regime. These losses were temporarily masked by overemployment in the construction industry due to a real estate bubble.

In the past, I have advocated for a greater fiscal policy response on the basis of a demand shortfall and even cited unemployment of the unskilled as a justification. Since this unemployment is structural and permanent, Keynesian stimulus will not be effective, but instead only provide temporary relief. IE, for these jobs there is no demand shortfall, since they are not going to be brought back by the private sector economy.

As I look to my previous analysis, I can see only the public sector jobs that are yet to be cut, by states wrestling with budget crises, as a possible justification for Keynesian stimulus. Yet some of those cuts most certainly will be structural as well. What's more, as much of these cuts are likely to come from education, it is likely that structural problems for the low skilled will be exacerbated.

Therefore, while my  policy prescription remains the same for short term US policy; I now believe on balance the appropriate justification is redistributionist reform and that the Keynesian stimulus rationale is less compelling than I once thought.

 It has been a long held personal view, that the most challenging problem confronting the US is how to bring the uneducated poor and lower middle class along as the global economy is developing. Even healthcare reform is not as threatening to the US economy. Society needs to work for most of its members or the system will  become increasingly unstable. The rich and elites need to enact reform for their own benefit, not solely for the benefit of the underclass; otherwise the country their children will inherit will become much less hospitable than the one they live in today.

 Incarceration of the poor, as they turn to crime is not an option; as the US has already exhausted that policy option. At year-end 2007, the United  States had less than 5% of the world's population and 23.4% of the world's prison and jail population (adult
inmates).

This is why Jeffrey Sachs is advocating economic development policies for the United States. Unfortunately, prophets are
rarely accepted in their own country. After years of talking about these issues to my students, colleagues and friends, I am no longer wandering alone in the wilderness on this issue.

For those interested in a peek into the future, that has already arrived and is growing like a cancer everday, in America, check out "The Wire".


2 Comments

Score-keeping and gratuitous ego-display vol. 1

9/12/2011

0 Comments

 
Jeffrey Sachs and I see the US economic situation in a very similar light. I could copy the entire article and say "I told you so" in one form or other in every post I made so far. As I have shown you, the story is all there in the FRED data.  At least Sachs can recognize when there is a dragon in the room.

Here are few of the highlights.

"The structural problem is that America has lost its international competitiveness in basic industries including textiles, apparel, and several other areas of manufacturing.  The production jobs are now in China, India, and elsewhere, where wages are much lower while productivity is more or less comparable to the US (and where production often involves US companies, using US
technologies, producing overseas and re-exporting to the US market).  Only US college grads can resist the international competitive pressures; high-school grads have found the labor market fall out from beneath their feet. 

America requires at least a decade of well-designed and well-executed  national investments in people, infrastructure, and innovative technologies, in order to boost competitiveness and renovate the economy.  Yet such an effort requires serious plans, careful deliberation, and higher taxation on deadbeat corporations and the super-rich.  (Obama's endorsement of lowering corporate tax rates in return for ending loopholes augers poorly once again, since it invites yet another gimmicky tax negotiation in the interests of the rich.)  The  necessary professionalism of government and the shared responsibility of America's elites have proven to be elusive for the White House, the Congress, and both political parties." 

I have noted in almost every post so far that the problem in the US is that the uneducated poor and middle class are being disenfranchised from the US Economy and that this will eventually provoke serious social unrest and destabilze the broader economy.  If Congress and Obama were to read and adhere to Sachs advice, the US would go through a few rough years and then be back on a normal trajectory. Unfortunately, I am not optomisitc that US lawmakers will come up with such a plan in the year of a presidential election. As I said in a earlier post, trade sanctions seem much more likely than education reform and a comprehensive infrastructue plan.

Meanwhile the dragon gets bigger everyday.

0 Comments

We are all hedge fund managers now

9/11/2011

0 Comments

 
September 11, 2001, was a day many people awoke to the reality of risks in a open society. There is a new reality of risk with
which asset managers and risk managers the world over must also come to terms. Volatility of asset returns is going up because the world is a more risky place than it used to be and because the traders and risk managers the world over are making similar decisions based on similar global macro trade-offs and outcomes. We are living in an era where there are significant positive feedback loops to the volatility of returns. My economic outlook is that we are in a bear market that is likely to continue for the foreseeable future.  As a result, in order to mitigate volatility and increase returns managers will have to select more market neutral strategies, or stay in cash and attempt to time the market. Traditional buy and hold strategies run the risk of inducing
panic selling from clients when things turn bad. In other words, we are witnessing a convergence of trading strategies where portfolio managers must act like risk managers who must act like hedge fund managers . There will be little “free money” in terms of predictable returns on the table and a portfolio manager’s value added (alpha) will become readily apparent to the client. Traditional buy and hold strategies in  this environment are going to underperform relative to market neutral strategies.

Portfolio managers are now living in a new world of performance. The interrelated drivers of asset returns in the nineties: falling interest  rates, strong global growth, and increasing leverage are all set to become impediments to assets returns for the foreseeable future. What’s more asset returns between equities bonds and commodities have also increased in downside correlation. The western world is saddled with debt, high unemployment and a lack of demand as a legacy of the excesses of the last two decades. As a  result, corporate earnings are going to struggle to grow for the next decade. 

A glance at the performance of global indices on Friday, September 9th, reveals this more recent trend in global equity returns. When the  market experiences a sharp selloff return correlations seem to approach unity. The global market is now integrated and as a result the imbalances in the global market are now integrated. This means one regions problems are now the world  problems.

We are living  at a time where almost every major economy is pursuing loose monetary policy and fiscal austerity. The implication of this is that economic agents are facing the same trade off everywhere and making similar risk management decisions based on using the same data and running the same statistical models. For those who place their faith in time series models: CAVEAT EMPTOR - THIS HISTORICAL DATA SET WAS NOT FORMED UNDER THESE MACROECONOMIC CONDITIONS. While I can't support this position empircally, and address it only anecdotely below, it is my assertion that the data generating process of the past varies substantially with the current process

Even though one could argure that I take liberties with  my conclusions, the delinkage between current data generation and historical series should be obvious to anyone with a minimum background in statistical and economic analysis. Answer these questions - what is the appropriate reference point for data generation in today's economic climate? What other time was like just this? Is today's recovery indicative of past recessions? 

As a result, the traditional processes for diversification and risk management based on historical correlations are of questionable value. They are very likely to provide less downside risk mitigation than historical data would suggest. Since many of the largest global economic agents are on the same side of trades, when these positions reverse we are likely to see shaper sell offs, that is, the volatility of individual and portfolio asset returns are likely to dramatically increase in the future. Given the degree of global adjustments required to restore imbalances and put the global economy on a sustainable trajectory, this trend is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. While every moment in time is unique in some way, the current economic situation is very much different from almost any other period in modern history.

How blind are we flying? It is impossible to know since we are in undiscoverd territory. More than ever, what matters now is judgement rather than statistical expertise. I present two examples to support my case that we are living in a a world where thinking is required now more than ever and statistical models of forecasting relationships are out of tune with the current nature of stochastic behaviour.  The deep revisions to economic growth estimates and the behaviour of the VIX over the last couple of years.

 After 15 years of economic prosperity, what has come to be called  the Great Moderation, financial excesses predictably
developed into a credit bubble
  of such magnitude that it threatened the solvency of US and European financial system. Recovery is going to require an extended period of deleveraging that will be a drag on economic growth for years to come. But it seems the more things change the more they stay the same. The denial of last decade’s burgeoning credit bubble has been replaced by a denial of the realities of western economies’ resultant health and the policies that are required for recovery.  The credit markets froze  up in 2008; the financial system flat lined and required open heart resuscitation.  And yet it appears that most of the mainstream economists and policy makers are treating 2008 like a run of the mill case of the flu or recession. This over optimism is evidenced by the tsunami of market forecasters cutting their growth forecasts.  
 
It seems the world began mispricing risk soon after the financial collapse of 2008.. In December of 2009, the VIX, the near month volatility index of the S&P 500, was trading at sub 20. From my perspective this was far  too low. I entered into a series of exchanges with a hedge fund manager, who was agnostic at the time. I started to wonder if the FED, with its monetary policies, was creating systematic risk in the economy. Earlier this year, the hedge fund manager sent me a blog link discussing this very issue. I quote from the link which itself quotes from an Artemis Capital Management, a  volatility-focused investment management firm:

“The  artificially low volatility in markets may contribute to a dangerous build up in  systemic risk. Many investment banks and hedge funds use volatility as an input  to determine leverage capacity. When the Fed artificially depresses spot
volatility it produces a feedback loop whereby large banks can increase their appetite for risk, increasing assets prices, and further lowering volatility. It  should be no surprise that NYSE margin debt is at its highest level since July  of 2008
”

Artemis  explained the phenomenon the following way.

 1) Changes in  the supply/demand dynamics of volatility:
Recent structural changes in the supply demand dynamics of volatility may be contributing to the distortions reflected in today’s vol surface. 
 

First, a liquidity shortage on the long-end of the OTC volatility surface emerged as  sophisticated players covered short positions following substantial losses on  volatility derivatives in May (less supply).

  2)
A preference for longer-dated volatility hedging is emerging and also changing  the demand picture:

 Secondly,  there has been a recent proliferation of new“tail risk” or “black swan” hedging  strategies that have increased the demand for long-dated volatility and far out-of-the-money options (more  demand). 

  3)  Gamma selling is rife: 
 
Thirdly , as margin debt has expanded many funds are now shorting spot volatility and buying long-vol to collect pennies from underneath the  proverbial steamroller (short-term supply, long-term demand).
 
So what are the implications for investors? These are not good times for buy and hold strategies. The underlying drivers of growth in the stock market:  economic growth, leverage and interest rates -are either neutral or contrary.  The  market is likely to be range bound.

A range-bound market is ideal for setting an asset allocation and picking up the benefits of rebalancing. Someone who is *really* committed to an allocation may also sell out-of-the-money covered puts and covered calls (looking to get paid for accepting the constraints of algorithmic rebalancing); current levels of implied volatility may make this seem more attractive.
  
I like David Rosenberg’s view of how to play the current situation a  summary of which was posted on the excellent website, Zerohedge.  I include it below.

Recession  Protection

Hedge  funds that really hedge the risk or relative-value strategies that can go short low-quality and high-cyclical equities while going long a basket of high- quality and low-cyclical equities will be a money-maker in this environment. Those that have the capacity to short economically-sensitive stocks that trade at cycle-high P/E multiples may have an advantage in such a weakening macro and  market environment.

 A  focus on hybrids or income-equity portfolios that have low correlations with the direction of the equity market and generate a yield far superior than what you can garner in the Treasury market makes perfect  sense.

 And  if there is anything out there that is remotely close to "recession proof" it is  corporate balance sheets and so an emphasis on credit is going to be critical —  the idea is to be selective and identify those entities that have a single-A  balance sheet but pay out a BBB  yield.

We  are believers that gold and gold mining stocks will prove to be profitable investments as the economic downturn inevitably prompts more money printing, not  just out of the Fed, but other major central banks as well.

 Commodities in general, energy and raw food in particular, should be a core position, as they are behaving less cyclically and more as a secular growth theme linked to  the rapidly rising incomes in the emerging market  economies.

 The  economy and risk assets typically hit a speed bump in a recession. That much is true, but investment ideas and opportunities within the market can still  flourish even in a bear phase or a correction — cash should not have to be an
option.


 The  key is to be positioned appropriately for the part of the business cycle we are on the cusp of entering. In a nutshell, what that means is carefully-  constructed investment strategies and portfolios that preserve capital, minimize  cyclical exposures, enhance yield and thereby provide for significant risk-  adjusted returns—even in a recession. In light of these heightened volatile
times, we also realize that this is not necessarily a buy and hold market, and  the ability to move into equity markets and take advantage of weakness should  also be a part of the strategy.


 Where I diverge from David’s view is that I would probably be more willing to go into cash if I thought valuations were too out of whack. For  instance, the market, as I alluded to in my discussion on the VIX, was  mispricing short term risk. When I think valuations are too high and market risk pricing is too low then I believe I would move into cash. Let me underscore, once more, the importance of relative valuations and market risk as essential to investing over the next decade.

  I  am also more biased towards business tech stocks that improve productivity because I think businesses, ripe with cash, are going to be investing in more  capital to lower their labour costs over the next decade.

 I would echo David’s emphasize on the importance of long/short  strategies and add that derivative strategies need to play a role in investment  returns. Portfolio management and hedge fund management are converging.

We have more risk because the world economic prospects have worsened. We have more risks because major economies are facing similar challenges and responding in similar ways. Incentives facing agents are simillar all over the world. With everyone acting the same way and being in the same situation it is difficult to imagine that cost effective insurance is available, that the benefits of diverisifcation will reach historical levels or that statistical analysis will provide the key to naviagting the current investment climate. Our old maps are of limited value.

Like Alice (in Wonderland) we find ourselves in a strange new land.

“Which road do I take?" (Alice)

 "Where do you want to go?"(cat)

 "I don't know," Alice answered.

 "Then, said the cat, it doesn't matter.”

Unfortunately for portfolio manangers, risk managers and hedge funds - everything counts in large amounts. 


 
0 Comments

Long Run thinking and Macroeconomic analysis

9/8/2011

0 Comments

 
Macroeconomic analysis is foundedon on systems thinking. One is always looking for fundamental imbalances that cannot be sustained over the long run. These imbalances are often not recognized by many analysts and build up slowly overtime. I have come to think of the global economy in terms of the  human body. If you force your body out of balance by overeating, over drinking or some other form of abuse there are short term effects and long term effects. The short term effects can seem small and inconsequential in the moment, while the long term health debts are growing.  Many analysts seem blissfully unware of the approaching dangers and indeed even argrue that the system is in no danger at all. Relax everything is fine. The market wil solve all problems.

An example of this type of bad analysis can be found on this blog post which is commenting on a report on downward mobility in America. The blogger commenting on the findings of the report states:
 
"But turn that around and what do you get? A fairly simple recipe  for staying in the middle class: Go to college, get married, stay married, steer clear of hard drugs.
 
Do those simple things and the odds are on your side. The keys to a financially successful life seem to be family, education, sobriety. Seems boring and obvious, doesn’t it? But it also suggests that American life isn’t quite as bad as the press wants to paint it."

 
I guess this blogger has a different perception of the definition of “simple” than I do. My assertion is that if 50% of marriages fail- staying married is not simple. Paraphrasing Billy Graham, America’s most revered evangelist, he once asked his wife if she had ever considered divorce to which  she replied “no - but I have considered  murder”.


Is it simple to go to college? The US public primary and secondary education system has been in decline for 30 years. Post-secondary education costs are sky rocketing, while middle class wages are stagnant to declining and health care costs are growing at 2-3 times the rate of GDP.

 What about the broader question of mobility in general. Can someone born in urban America achieve the middle class in the same way that someone who is born in Fairfax,  Virginia?

 What depresses me about society is that we often fail to even achieve the minimal threshold of discourse necessary to move policy forward. We do not reach agreement on the definition of the core of the problem.
 
Of course, the longer we take to address systemic imbalances the bigger the problem gets (see my dragon analogy last post). Have another burger and beer, watch a football game - Rome is slowly burning.

 My feelings and frustrations on this and other public policy points on this can be summed up in this way.        

JERRYPOURNELLE: DESPAIR IS A SIN:
“I do not warn you of a future you cannot avoid. On the other hand I have for forty years warned that we are approaching a precipice, and yet we continue to move toward it. Sometimes I get discouraged.”

0 Comments

    Author

    Karl Pinno

    Categories

    All
    60 Minutes
    Abnormal Returns
    Academic Publishing
    Advice For Econ Students
    Age
    Aid
    Algo Trading
    Aluminum
    Argentina
    Assortive Matching
    Austerity
    Bank Of England
    Behavioural Economics
    Bio Weapons
    Bis
    Bloomberg
    Bonds
    Bono
    Book Of Mormon
    Brain
    Brazil
    Brics
    Bridgewater Associates
    Buffet
    Calgary
    Canada
    Capital Flight
    Carola Binder
    Cds
    Central Banks
    Chainmail Bikinis
    Chanos
    Child Rearing
    China
    Chris Martenson
    Christmas Wishlist
    Climate Change
    College Humor
    Commercial Banks
    Commodities
    Community
    Computer Programming
    Confirmation Bias
    Conservatism
    Conservative
    Constructive Ambiquity
    Consumer Confidence
    Copper
    Corporate Lending
    Counterparty Risk
    Creativity
    Credit
    Culture
    Cwb
    David Einhorn
    David Rosenberg
    Debate
    Debt Crisis
    Deflation
    Demographics
    Depression
    Development
    Dragons
    Dr. Ed's Blog
    Econ Blogs
    Economics
    Ecri
    Education
    Electricity
    Eurasia Group
    Eurozone
    Excercise
    Externalities
    Falkenblog
    Ferguson
    Fertility
    Filtering
    Financial Crisis 2008
    Financial Engineering
    Financial Reform
    Financial Repression
    Financial Research
    Fiscal Policy
    Fiscal Stimulus
    Fisher
    Fixed Income
    Flood
    Food Prices
    Frank And Cook
    Fraud
    Freidman
    Ft
    Game Theory
    Gender
    Generalist
    George Soros
    Get Smart
    Giffen Good
    Global Banking
    Global Economy
    Gmo
    Godfather
    Gold
    Goldman Sachs
    Great Careers
    Greece
    Greenlight Capital
    Happiness
    Hayman Capital Management Lp
    Hbo
    Health
    Hedge Funds
    Homosexuality
    Housing Market
    Hubbard
    Hugh Hendry
    Hussman
    Ian Bremmer
    Imf
    Inception
    Income Smoothing
    India
    Inequality
    Inflation
    Inflationary Expectations
    Inside Job
    Interest Rates
    Interfluidity
    Intuition
    Inventories
    Iran
    Iraq
    Italy
    Janusian Thinking
    Japan
    Jordan Peterson
    Jp Morgan
    Judgement
    Kalecki Equation
    Krugman
    Kyle Bass
    Larry Smith
    Larry Summers
    Lehman Brothers
    Levitt
    Liberal
    Lonely Island
    Luck
    Macro
    Macro Intro
    Macro Predictions
    Management Consulting
    Marginal Revolution
    Market Design
    Market Monetarism
    Marx
    Matt Taibbi
    Mercantilism
    Michael Portillo
    Milton Friedman
    Mircea Eliade
    Mish
    Mishkin
    Monetary Policy
    Monetary Stimulus
    Multipliers
    Mundell
    Music
    Nanex
    Nfl
    Noahpinion
    Nobel Price In Economics
    Oil Price Volatility
    Oil Production
    Omitted Variable Bias
    Optimism Bias
    Overcomingbias
    Palantir
    Pettis
    Phillips Curve
    Placebo
    Podcasts
    Poker
    Poland
    Politico
    Politics
    Populism
    Portfolio Management
    Positivism
    Prisoner's Dilemma
    Productivity
    Psychology
    Publishing
    Quality
    Quantitative Easing
    Race
    Rand Paul
    Ray Dalio
    Rbc Theory
    Real Interest Rates
    Reality Tv
    Recession
    Redistributionist Reform
    Regulators
    Regulatory Capture
    Remembrance Day
    Research
    Richard Wilkinson
    Riots
    Risk
    Risk Taking
    Robots
    Roubini
    Russia
    Ryan
    Sachs
    Salt
    Saudi Arabia
    Sec
    Seth Klarman
    Shadowbanking
    Shiller
    Signaling
    Smes
    Snap
    Social Policy
    Social Unrest
    Society
    Sorkin
    Soros
    S&P
    Spain
    Specialization
    Speculation
    State Sponsored Terrorism
    Status
    Steve Jobs
    Steven Keen
    Stress
    Structural Unemployment
    Structure Finance
    Sugar
    Suicide
    Svars
    Systemic Risk
    Tax
    Taylor Rule
    Technology
    Ted
    Television
    The Clash
    The Economist
    The Wire
    Thinking
    Thoureau
    Trade
    Trilemma
    Turkey
    Tyler Cowen
    U2
    Unemployment
    Us 2012 Election
    Us Economy
    Us Foreign Policy
    Velocity
    Volatility
    Welfare
    Williams
    Words
    Work
    Writing
    Zerohedge
    Zig Ziglar

    Archives

    November 2017
    October 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.