Economic Presence
  • Home
  • Paradox found
    • Paradox found

JEP article on Economics Phds training, school rankings, hiring selection and performance

8/27/2014

0 Comments

 
"If the objective of graduate training in top-ranked departments is to produce successful research economists, then these graduate programs are largely failing. Only a small percentage of economics PhDs manage to produce a creditable number of publications by their sixth year after graduation.

For graduate students in economics (and also potential graduate students), the message is that becoming a successful research economist is difficult. The good news  is that one does not have to go to a top department in order to become a successful research economist. The bad news is that wherever one goes, only the very best of each class is likely to find academic success as defined by research publications.

Indeed, to become a tenured professor of economics one must cross many hurdles. Admission to an economics PhD program is difficult: most well-ranked departments receive several hundred highly competitive applications for entering classes that generally number between 10 and 30. Many of those admitted to a graduate program will ultimately fail to complete their degree. For example, Stock, Siegfried, and Finegan (2011) find that graduation rates from economics PhD programs are on the order of 30 percent by the fifth year after admission, rising to around 60 percent by the eighth year. (There is wide variability, but the higher-ranked programs seem to have higher graduation rates in general.) Even for those who do complete the PhD, the likelihood of ultimately accumulating a research record that might gain tenure at a top-100 department (much less a top-30or top-10 department) is not very great. 

Thus, students thinking about applying to PhD programs in economics would be well advised to have “Plan B’s” for every stage of the journey—including the possibility of not being accepted into a PhD program, the possibility of not completing the program, the possibility of not finding a suitable academic job, and the possibility of not receiving tenure. We hasten to add that there are many rewarding and worthwhile nonresearch and nonacademic career paths open to those who obtain masters or doctorate degrees in economics, and many students discover, either while in graduate school or during their untenured years, that they actually prefer these sorts of jobs to the academic life.

These results also raise some concerns for those of us who sit on admission committees and teach in graduate programs. To be admitted to a top PhD program in economics, an applicant has to have great grades, near-perfect test scores, strong and credible recommendations, and package these credentials in a way that stands out to the admission committee. Thus, successful candidates must be hardworking, intelligent, well-trained, savvy, and ambitious. Why is it that the majority of these successful applicants, who apparently did all the right things up to the time they arrived at graduate school and even managed to complete their PhDs, have such unimpressive careers as researchers? Are we failing the students or are the students failing us?

Our evidence is based on the accumulated record after six years, which unfortunately is not the information available to the hiring committee at the time the hire is made. Some evidence suggests that hiring committees may not be very accurate at forming expectations of quality when a new PhD hits the job market. Smeets, Warzynski, and Coupé (2006) explore the efficiency of the academic job market in matching students to positions. They study the 1992 and 1993 PhD cohorts fromthe 26 best graduate schools and discover that the matching of quality students to quality first jobs is not as tight as one might hope. They further show there is substantial, mostly downward, movement from the first to the final job hold, and overall, the research productivity of students who get first jobs of various qualities does not differ as starkly as we see in Table 1. This finding suggests that the students who are identified as top graduates in a given year (and who get top jobs as result) might not line up with the students who end up being the most productive six years later. For example, our data show that publishing a paper before graduation is uncorrelated with the productivity over the six-year probationary period before a tenure decision."































0 Comments

New (and old) RBC models summarized via Noah Smith

8/22/2014

1 Comment

 
Via Noahpinion. Seems to me that new RBC research is a justification for MM in that NGDP targeting would decrease information asymmetries across the economy and would constitute the policy action of providing more information to the economy. These MM contribution to providing information should be greater than a money growth rule or inflation targeting.
1 Comment

Georgia O'keeffe Tribute

8/17/2014

0 Comments

 
I went to an exhibition on Georgia O'keeffe in Las Vegas (with Brent) that moved me deeply. She was a true vanguard and independent spirit.
0 Comments

 Universities may have an incentive for grade inflation

8/17/2014

0 Comments

 
Via Vox

"This analysis therefore reveals an important tradeoff in the debate over grade inflation. Allowing grade inflation increases investment in education (by both schools and students), increasing average graduate ability. But at the same time, it introduces noise into transcripts, making it more difficult for employers or other evaluators to identify the most qualified graduates for their positions. We show that the beneficial effect on investment may dominate the costs of increased noise. Allowing grade inflation may actually increase the chance that the employer selects a high-ability graduate. That suggests that even if a policy intervention could eliminate grade inflation, doing so is not necessarily the most socially desirable course of action.

Therefore, the central concerns over grade inflation may not be valid once incentives for schools to invest in the quality of education are taken into account. Although the freedom to grade strategically allows schools to distort the informational content of grades (which they do in equilibrium), it also creates additional incentives for schools to improve the quality of education and students to increase effort. Compared to a setting in which grades are necessarily fully informative, the increase in education investments can lead to employers, graduate schools, and other evaluators being better off."



0 Comments

Measures of systemic risk  from NYU

8/16/2014

0 Comments

 
China looks bad, Japan and Europe are high but have decreased. Via Econobroser. (Thanks again Brent)
0 Comments

Chinese economic data don't make sense

8/16/2014

0 Comments

 
WSJ  (Thanks Brent) 

So, how is China achieving 7.5% growth if it is powering down steel plants and letting copper stockpiles build up? With debt.

Despite official instructions to banks to curtail lending to overstretched developers and municipalities, loans are still increasing at rates twice as fast as the economy—and those numbers exclude a so-called shadow-banking lending system estimated at more than $5 trillion, or 80% of gross domestic product.

“That doesn’t make sense,” says PNC Financial economist Bill Adams. “Eventually, sustainability concerns will either cause Chinese policy makers to slow credit growth or investor risk aversion will cause less credit to flow through the trust companies” that manage the shadow lending programs.

0 Comments

How successful people cope with stress

8/16/2014

0 Comments

 
Via LinkedIn and the NYTimes.
0 Comments

Why it is so hard to find your own mistakes in your writing

8/16/2014

0 Comments

 
The scientific justification of three years of typos on these pages. Via Wired.

"The reason typos get through isn’t because we’re stupid or careless, it’s because what we’re doing is actually very smart, explains psychologist Tom Stafford, who studies typos of the University of Sheffield in the UK. “When you’re writing, you’re trying to convey meaning. It’s a very high level task,” he said.

As with all high level tasks, your brain generalizes simple, component parts (like turning letters into words and words into sentences) so it can focus on more complex tasks (like combining sentences into complex ideas). “We don’t catch every detail, we’re not like computers or NSA databases,” said Stafford. “Rather, we take in sensory information and combine it with what we expect, and we extract meaning.” When we’re reading other peoples’ work, this helps us arrive at meaning faster by using less brain power. When we’re proof reading our own work, we know the meaning we want to convey. Because we expect that meaning to be there, it’s easier for us to miss when parts (or all) of it are absent. The reason we don’t see our own typos is because what we see on the screen is competing with the version that exists in our heads."







0 Comments

Karl Marx was right - Global Imbalances

8/10/2014

0 Comments

 
Via Reuters.

Now for the bad news. While the steady or slightly accelerating global growth rates predicted by the IMF is the most likely outcome, it may not be achievable because of three imbalances: social, geographical and demographic. These seem deeply embedded in the structure of global capitalism today. They are weakening demand, creating excess savings and driving the buildup of borrowing and lending that has been both a cause and consequence of the global financial crisis.

The most dangerous imbalance is in the distribution of wealth and income. Income disparities have become a source of political and moral controversy, but their macroeconomic effects have attracted less attention. The mechanism whereby income inequality causes economic stagnation was recognized by Karl Marx and other 19th-century writers.

If too much of the income created by capitalism’s capacity to increase production flows to people who are already rich and likely to save rather than spend, then crises of under-consumption become almost inevitable, as described by Marx in Das Kapital and analyzed more rigorously by John Maynard Keynes in the 1930s. The only way to avert such crises is to create financial systems that recycle excess incomes from rich savers to poorer consumers via a buildup of debt.

Geographical imbalances are a second major cause of weak demand. The global imbalance that generated controversy before the crisis was between the United States and Asia. This has largely disappeared as U.S. consumption and borrowing have subsided, while China and Japan have shifted away from export-driven growth models.

In the meantime, however, an equally troublesome imbalance has emerged between Germany and the rest of the Europe. Germany’s current account surplus of 7 percent of GDP is now larger and more persistent than the Japanese or Chinese surpluses before the crisis. Yet on the global stage, Germany is not subjected to the same sort of pressures. Germany’s political dominance in Europe also makes it immune to the kind of demands for policy changes that Washington applied to Japan and China, while the existence of the euro rules out the currency adjustments that ultimately removed the imbalances between Asia and the United States.

The third imbalance is demographic. Believers in secular stagnation have drawn attention to the downward pressure on labor supply as baby boomers retire. But this is unimportant in a period of high unemployment, when there is no shortage of workers to limit economic output. The bigger impact of demographic aging is on macroeconomic demand. Particularly when this problem is aggravated by Social Security and labor policies that shift incomes and economic opportunities in favor of retirees and older workers at the expense of younger generations.




0 Comments

My Brother Passes Away

8/5/2014

1 Comment

 
After a long illness, my brother passed away last Thursday.  Amongst some of his items, I found some poetry he had written which I post below. My brother, like myself, had a difficult time integrating into society as his poem, Alienation, suggests.

I recently reflected on a health issue that has plagued me my entire adult life -problems with my feet. As a teenager, I played many sports and even averaged 42 miles a week running without problems. When I got older, however, I started to have all kinds of problems with my feet. Ingrown toe nails that eventually required surgery, heel problems where I had cortisone shots to get rid of the pain and inflammation, acupuncture treatments to get rid of my heel pain. I finally solved the heel problems, a year ago,  by adopting a lower elevation shoe (courtesy of a link sent to me by Brent) . But then last year, I developed a painful neuroma. Needless to say all of these painful foot maladies have combined with my penchant for food and I now weigh 290 lbs.  To get through a week of teaching last year I was taking powerful anti-inflammatories on off days that dulled my senses. One late night last fall, I found a podiatrist for the American Northwest that did this series of videos which purported that the cause of most feet maladies was an improper (overly narrow) toe box.

The solution itself was a problem. I have size 15 triple E feet and most of the sellers of the proper toe box footwear don't make a shoe for the size of my foot. I managed to find one and for the most part my foot problems have disappeared.

One day in reflecting on my experience, a 20+ year struggle with my feet, I realized that my feet weren't he problem. I wasn't the problem. I had tried everything to fix them and the real issue was the shoes that world provided me didn't fit my feet.

I feel like this would be my message to my brother, John you may not have fit in this world very comfortably but there was nothing wrong with you.




Alienation

How long must I go on,

Until I feel that I will belong,

Somewhere on this earth?

When will I know,

Where to stay or where to go?

And show what I’m worth.

I just want to know that I belong

Like the ugly duck that becomes a swan

Like the frog that became a prince

I want to find my happiness.




If I Knew Then What I Know Now

If I knew then what I know now,

I wouldn’t make the same mistakes,

I’d say “I love you” more than ever,

I’d cherish the time we spent together,

Even through the nasty weather,

If I knew then what I know now, 




If I knew then what I know now,

I’d be much more forgiving,

Sins that happened in the past,

Would be forgiven very fast,

Bitter feelings would never last,

If I knew then what I know now,




If I knew then what I know now,

I’d recognize your efforts,

All the tears and all the pain,

You suffered not in vain,

As you stumbled in the rain,

If I knew then what I know now,




I’d be there for you always,

Through the good times and the bad,

When you’re happy and you’re sad,

I’d have given all I had, just to be with you.

If I knew then what I know now.










1 Comment

    Author

    Karl Pinno

    Categories

    All
    60 Minutes
    Abnormal Returns
    Academic Publishing
    Advice For Econ Students
    Age
    Aid
    Algo Trading
    Aluminum
    Argentina
    Assortive Matching
    Austerity
    Bank Of England
    Behavioural Economics
    Bio Weapons
    Bis
    Bloomberg
    Bonds
    Bono
    Book Of Mormon
    Brain
    Brazil
    Brics
    Bridgewater Associates
    Buffet
    Calgary
    Canada
    Capital Flight
    Carola Binder
    Cds
    Central Banks
    Chainmail Bikinis
    Chanos
    Child Rearing
    China
    Chris Martenson
    Christmas Wishlist
    Climate Change
    College Humor
    Commercial Banks
    Commodities
    Community
    Computer Programming
    Confirmation Bias
    Conservatism
    Conservative
    Constructive Ambiquity
    Consumer Confidence
    Copper
    Corporate Lending
    Counterparty Risk
    Creativity
    Credit
    Culture
    Cwb
    David Einhorn
    David Rosenberg
    Debate
    Debt Crisis
    Deflation
    Demographics
    Depression
    Development
    Dragons
    Dr. Ed's Blog
    Econ Blogs
    Economics
    Ecri
    Education
    Electricity
    Eurasia Group
    Eurozone
    Excercise
    Externalities
    Falkenblog
    Ferguson
    Fertility
    Filtering
    Financial Crisis 2008
    Financial Engineering
    Financial Reform
    Financial Repression
    Financial Research
    Fiscal Policy
    Fiscal Stimulus
    Fisher
    Fixed Income
    Flood
    Food Prices
    Frank And Cook
    Fraud
    Freidman
    Ft
    Game Theory
    Gender
    Generalist
    George Soros
    Get Smart
    Giffen Good
    Global Banking
    Global Economy
    Gmo
    Godfather
    Gold
    Goldman Sachs
    Great Careers
    Greece
    Greenlight Capital
    Happiness
    Hayman Capital Management Lp
    Hbo
    Health
    Hedge Funds
    Homosexuality
    Housing Market
    Hubbard
    Hugh Hendry
    Hussman
    Ian Bremmer
    Imf
    Inception
    Income Smoothing
    India
    Inequality
    Inflation
    Inflationary Expectations
    Inside Job
    Interest Rates
    Interfluidity
    Intuition
    Inventories
    Iran
    Iraq
    Italy
    Janusian Thinking
    Japan
    Jordan Peterson
    Jp Morgan
    Judgement
    Kalecki Equation
    Krugman
    Kyle Bass
    Larry Smith
    Larry Summers
    Lehman Brothers
    Levitt
    Liberal
    Lonely Island
    Luck
    Macro
    Macro Intro
    Macro Predictions
    Management Consulting
    Marginal Revolution
    Market Design
    Market Monetarism
    Marx
    Matt Taibbi
    Mercantilism
    Michael Portillo
    Milton Friedman
    Mircea Eliade
    Mish
    Mishkin
    Monetary Policy
    Monetary Stimulus
    Multipliers
    Mundell
    Music
    Nanex
    Nfl
    Noahpinion
    Nobel Price In Economics
    Oil Price Volatility
    Oil Production
    Omitted Variable Bias
    Optimism Bias
    Overcomingbias
    Palantir
    Pettis
    Phillips Curve
    Placebo
    Podcasts
    Poker
    Poland
    Politico
    Politics
    Portfolio Management
    Prisoner's Dilemma
    Productivity
    Psychology
    Publishing
    Quality
    Quantitative Easing
    Race
    Rand Paul
    Ray Dalio
    Rbc Theory
    Real Interest Rates
    Reality Tv
    Recession
    Redistributionist Reform
    Regulators
    Regulatory Capture
    Remembrance Day
    Research
    Richard Wilkinson
    Riots
    Risk
    Risk Taking
    Robots
    Roubini
    Russia
    Ryan
    Sachs
    Salt
    Saudi Arabia
    Sec
    Seth Klarman
    Shadowbanking
    Shiller
    Signaling
    Smes
    Snap
    Social Policy
    Social Unrest
    Society
    Sorkin
    Soros
    S&P
    Spain
    Specialization
    Speculation
    State Sponsored Terrorism
    Status
    Steve Jobs
    Steven Keen
    Stress
    Structural Unemployment
    Structure Finance
    Sugar
    Suicide
    Svars
    Systemic Risk
    Tax
    Taylor Rule
    Technology
    Ted
    Television
    The Clash
    The Economist
    The Wire
    Thinking
    Thoureau
    Trade
    Trilemma
    Turkey
    Tyler Cowen
    U2
    Unemployment
    Us 2012 Election
    Us Economy
    Us Foreign Policy
    Velocity
    Volatility
    Welfare
    Williams
    Words
    Work
    Writing
    Zerohedge
    Zig Ziglar

    Archives

    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.